Explore
Enter a keyword in the search bar above to find articles, or use the filters to browse.
3,754 results • Page 131 of 313
After trying out various study tools, I decided to create my own. I wanted a quick and simple way to upload any study material, have the app generate questions, and then set up a daily review schedule. So, I built it by creating a RAG system and a scheduler to trigger the daily review sessions.
Delhi witnessed overwhelming violence on Monday, with at least 60 protesters wounded. Police said 118 of their men were also injured.
565 points 214 comments on Hacker News · qwen.ai
1 point 0 comments on Hacker News · sharden.website
The French studio is owned by Nacon, which filed for insolvency earlier this year.
1 point 0 comments on Hacker News · github.com
2 points 0 comments on Hacker News · drops.dagstuhl.de
2 points 0 comments on Hacker News · medium.com
1 point 0 comments on Hacker News · getwireai.com
You all know the drill: you want to write prose using an AI because it can draft faster than you can type your ideas out. Next thing that happens, you find yourself in an editing loop: change this, fix there, explain your world in more detail. The chat window scroll bar shrinks to 2 pixels and the chapter gets worse every turn. You wonder if your prompts got bad or if the AI has forgotten your world. What actually happens is the context window starts working against you. A context window works fine if you keep talking about ever-changing topics. When you write prose and ask for endless changes, the context fills up with copies of the same text in slightly different colors. Your actual changes become noise, not focus. My solution: a clean chat with zero context to fix one piece in one scene. Instead of spilling all my chapters into the prompt, I split my world setup into small Markdown files. When I start a new chat, all I put into context are mentions of those world files, the actual chapter, and relevant cast sheets. I let the agent do the heavy lifting. That's what Cursor is best for: finding its way around tons of files and making a code change like a surgeon. Side effect: your entire book stays as local files on your disk. My tool does not take your work hostage. When you ask for a change, you don't get back a full rewrite in a browser window—you get a targeted DIFF view on a text file. The chat context stays crisp and focused on exactly what you ask. So the paradigm change I promote is: go away from long-term chat sessions. Forget about "the next prompt will fix it." Start working in a controlled environment where rules are fetched on demand. You do not prompt anymore—you have a creative meeting. Since I don't trust anyone, not even myself, I added two mean critics to the system: 1. The AI Slop Critic: looks for where something sounds like generic AI prose. 2. The Story Critic: finds contradictions or plot holes in your story. The first time I ran the Slop Critic on a chapter, it came back and crushed my heart. It read so bad! But it gave a "fixable" verdict. To fix it, you right-click on the critic's finding and start a chat with your writer. A clean chat opens with the relevant context and the brief inside. All you do is hit return. Because these are plain text files, it also includes Git integration. It commits the chapter state upfront before each agent edit, showing you a diff to all historical versions with a few clicks. If you're still here, I will finally give you a name and a link to play with: Buckram Studio: https://open-vsx.org/extension/buckram/buckram-studio Or search for "Buckram Studio" inside Cursor. It's freemium so you can test the writing/editing process up to 50k words. Post on X: https://x.com/TorrenBramley/status/2079210475066114326 Ask me any question you want, or crush me like my mean critics :D
Israeli forces open fire on children in Syrian village
1 point 0 comments on Hacker News · ai-song.net
Hacker News
“GPT-5.5's API pricing is reshaping how startups build AI products”
